Greensburg Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Aug. 22, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Laurel: To common sense in human service funding. The Republican majority of Westmoreland County commissioners voted to apply for a pilot program under which the state would award a block grant to local officials, who then would divide the money among seven human service programs. Needs are better assessed locally than through Harrisburg's finite wisdom.
On the “Watch List”:
• The Derry pool query. A missing deposit of nearly $1,500 is no mere bag of seashells. Derry's council voted to hire a forensic accountant to look into the finances of the Derry Community Pool. Here's hoping for an outcome, and a resolution, that won't leave the pool's enthusiasts high and dry.
• Police presence. Since May, residents of Uniontown's East End have complained about shootings and other violence that plague their neighborhood. Some blame residents of the Pershing Court housing complex. Whatever's the cause of trouble, a big part of the solution is an increased police presence. That's where city leaders need to focus, preferably before a tragedy unfolds.
Best wishes: To all students, college, high school and elementary, who soon will be returning to their classrooms. There'll be plenty of work and challenges ahead. But those who work hard and push themselves to excel will acquire a discipline that will serve them well for the rest of their lives.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.