The Thursday wrap
Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker claimed last week that domestic manufacturers are making products “at an all-time record pace.” But economics scholar Alan Tonelson says the inflation-adjusted U.S. manufacturing production index for July was 4.24 percent below what it was at its December 2007 peak. Yet another in a long line of Obama administration fabrications. ... Making the rounds to an email in-box near you is a faux rendering of the National Security Agency seal with this slogan: “Peeping while you're sleeping.” And under the seal, this: “The NSA: The only part of the government that actually listens.” Sad but true. ... The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board says 102 wine and spirits stores will extend their hours. Amazing what the specter of losing its monopoly on such sales does to an organization, eh? ... The New York Times and The Associated Press have begun referring to convicted secrets leaker Bradley Manning, who apparently wants taxpayers to foot the bill for a sex-change transformation in prison, as “Chelsea Manning, formerly known as Pfc. Bradley Manning,” then “she” on subsequent references. That, they say, is to honor Mr. Manning's request to be addressed as a female. So much for journalism standing up for accuracy. ... How about that Miley Cyrus? She might be a role model for twerkers but that's not saying much. And we can only wonder how long it took doctors to re-implant her tongue into her mouth.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.