By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Aug. 31, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
The federal government has invented another euphemism for taxes. The IRS' final rule on ObamaCare's individual mandate uses the term “shared responsibility payment” more than 50 times, The Daily Caller reports. George Orwell would be proud. ... Sayeth Bill Clinton, “A great democracy does not make it harder to vote than to buy an assault weapon.” Neither should this great republic, which we are, but it doesn't. ... Speaking of guns, a new Harvard study concludes that more gun control does not necessarily lead to lower death rates (homicide and suicide) or violent crime. “(T)hose correlations are not observed when a large number of nations are compared around the world,” the study says. Translation: That dog won't hunt. ... Neither will Al Jazeera America. TV Newser reports that opening-day viewership for the mouthpiece for al-Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood was so low (How low was it?) that Nielsen could not accurately count how many people watched. Put another way, fewer people watched than attend a typical Steelers home game — by about 10,000 people. ... Jesse Jackson is having an incredible run of Loose Jaw Disease. Last week, he called tea partyers a “resurrection of the Confederacy.” And not long before that he said the murder of Australian Christopher Lane, in America on a college baseball scholarship, was “senseless violence (that) is frowned upon.” The more Mr. Jackson talks, the less relevant he becomes.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.