Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Aug. 29, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
On the “Watch List”:
• Cheswick council. The council is looking at three options regarding water supply for the borough and the first two — spending $1.25 million to refurbish the broken water plant or selling it to some unknown buyer — don't count. Both of those options are idiotic and will result only in water rates skyrocketing. The third option — buy water from Harmar, Oakmont, whomever — is the only one that makes any sense.
• The New Kensington urgent care center. Allegheny Valley Hospital, which runs the center, has eliminated weekend and holiday hours at the center and cut back daily hours to 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. AVH says the center isn't busy enough to justify the current schedule. Let's hope that's the case and this simply isn't part of the ongoing retrenchment in the Southwestern Pennsylvania health care war.
Laurel: To New Kensington-Arnold administrators. Superintendent John Pallone, Assistant Business Manager Rick Nealer and assistant high school principal Jeff Thimons were all involved in an effort to obtain low- or no-cost school supplies through foundations. Included in this was $150,000 in goods for $6,000. And Nealer and Thimons even drove to Illinois to pick up the supplies rather than have the district pay shipping. Now that's above and beyond.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- The market speaks: Cadillac dealers reject another electric folly
- Market perversions: Chrysler retreats
- The new SAT: Rigor gets a pass
- Sunday pops
- THE BOX