Labor Day 2013: Why we work
(Editor's note: On this Labor Day, a reprint of a classic Trib editorial.)
Work can be dreary, draining, frustrating — sometimes it is a hateful thing. On those days when we'd like to throw up our hands and head for the hills, we are reminded through bitter experience that it is a rare circumstance when not having a job is better than having one.
If the grass seems greener on the unemployment line, it's usually because we're not seeing clearly. Those of us who want jobs and have them should be thankful for the purpose and well-being they bring to our lives.
A life without labor to the benefit of self and others can be a sad thing indeed. So to those unemployed or underemployed, especially during these challenging times, we say, “Keep the faith.” For you will get back on your feet.
Labor Day is for gratitude. We all should thank those who support our physical and intellectual toils, whether it be owners or customers.
The former supply the capital and organizational structure through which each of us makes our contributions and earns our daily bread. The latter buy the fruits of our labors. Without either, there would be no jobs.
By the way, capital and labor are a fine pair when they work — not one in opposition to the other but in tandem to maximize value. It must be remembered that neither is sufficient unto itself.
Enjoy the holiday. For tomorrow, it's back to work. And isn't that grand.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obama’s Cuba deal: More appeasement
- The Thursday wrap
- An NLRB ambush
- Pension reform should not be linked to a natural gas extraction tax
- A carbon tax? Cap it
- U.N. Watch: Resist the temptation
- Union ‘fairness’: The dues racket
- Greensburg Tuesday takes