Share This Page

Abandoned buildings: Clean 'em up

| Friday, Aug. 30, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

The Connellsville Health Board and the city's zoning/health officer are worried about the dangers posed by the former WCVI building.

And so they should be.

The building, vacant for several years, is in danger of falling down. In fact, city officials fear what could happen if a fire occurred.

And, as this building is situated on one of Connellsville's main thoroughfares, a fire or collapse would be devastating.

Owned by Fayette County, the structure recently was sold for $700 to an individual from Phoenix. The new owner has until Sept. 30 to take possession of it.

And then what? Will the city have another fight on its hands, trying to force an out-of-town property owner to do something with a structure that clearly poses a danger to the community?

Out-of-state companies and individuals frequently buy vacant city structures in tax sales and other ways. Then nothing happens. And the buildings eventually become public nuisances.

This cycle must stop.

City, county and state lawmakers and officials need to work together to find ways and/or institute laws to make property owners responsible — most notably, out-of-state owners who neglect their responsibilities.

This is not merely a Connellsville “image” problem. It's a public safety concern that directly affects the city's economic growth and development.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.