Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
Laurel: To the Pirates. The Battlin' Bucs this weekend can avoid the embarrassment of a 21st-straight losing season by picking up their 82nd win of the year. And they certainly appear to be on the road to what for so long was the unthinkable — the playoffs. No, it's not a glide path but it's a solid one. The Pirates open a critical (and their last) series with St. Louis on Friday. The next goal — win the National League Central Division outright and better take control of their post-season. Let's go Bucs!
On the “Watch List”: The Steelers open the 2013 season on Sunday at home against the Tennessee Titans. Pittsburgh is coming off a less-than-stellar preseason (it went 0-4) and hoping to improve on last year's disappointing, no-playoffs 8-8 season. But some are wondering if things will get worse before they get better. Sure, maybe we didn't see much of the A-team playing its A-game in the preseason, but this team faces significant challenges. Here's to overcoming themselves. Here we go — we hope.
Lance: To A.J. Richardson. The erstwhile Democrat Pittsburgh mayor candidate is in trouble with the law. Again. Mr. Richardson, 37, of Sheraden, is charged with aggravated assault and resisting arrest in a neighborhood brawl. When he was running for mayor in the spring, he was charged with driving under the influence after police found him slumped over the wheel of a running vehicle. That case is pending. Get some help, A.J.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.