Saturday essay: Peace of mind
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Sept. 6, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
The winter forecasts have been all over the meteorological map.
Almanac A is calling for a brutally cold and snowy winter in this region of ours that's not quite the Midwest but always a gateway to its pernicious blasts.
Almanac B says the Middle Atlantic state that Pennsylvania is — west of the mountain range that disqualifies it for any “seaboard” designation — will be milder and wetter than usual but doesn't hint at whether that means fluffier, heavier snow or monsoon-like rains.
Almanac C, which drops us into the Ohio Valley forecasting model, is calling for a cold and dry winter with less snow than normal.
What's a would-be rugged individualist to do? Prepare for the worst, of course.
A cord and a half of firewood is split and ready to burn; another cord will be put up soon. Should there be a power outage, no one will freeze.
Slowly and deliberately, the basement pantry is being beefed up with canned and dry foodstuffs and liquids. Should the Snow or Ice Storm of the Century strike, nobody's going to starve. (The emergency radio and lighting sources are there, too).
The greenhouse will be fully transitioned to lettuce and herbs by then, which should be abundant well past the holidays.
But even if there's no winter calamity this year, the peace of mind will be worth it. And the warmth of the hearth will be that much more comforting.
— Colin McNickle
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- The Adegbile nomination: Rejecting race-baiting
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- Common Core: Garbage in, garbage out
- The Thursday wrap
- The Box
- The IRS scandal: Compelling Lerner
- Rein in the IRS by de-clubbing the thugs
- Corbett’s fortunes: Troubling truths
- The Russian invasion: Sanctions, now