| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Fight crime? A dubious program

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Sunday, Sept. 8, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Use of evidence that's selective at best, discredited at worst, makes worthless a law-enforcement group's case for President Obama's 10-year, $75 billion universal preschool proposal.

Consisting of more than 5,000 police officers, sheriffs and prosecutors, Fight Crime: Invest in Kids just released a study that claims Mr. Obama's proposal would result in long-term savings equal to its cost by reducing future incarcerations, The Daily Caller reports.

Grover Whitehurst, director of the Brookings Institution's Brown Center on Education Policy, says the group's claims rely on at least one “seriously flawed” prior study. There's “no reason to believe that the treatment and control” groups of children in the Chicago study that concerned a pre-kindergarten program “were similar to begin with.” Yet that Chicago study is the “primary resource used for the estimates in the Fight Crime report.”

Mr. Whitehurst also says that even if early education does cut future “incarceration rates among disadvantaged kids, there is no reason to expect that expanding the program to children from middle-class families would have the same effect.” Yet that's essentially what Obama wants to do.

The federal government itself says Head Start, costing $8 billion annually, hasn't produced lasting benefits for disadvantaged kids — a far better argument against nearly doubling preschool spending for 10 years than any that the Fight Crime study makes for Obama's plan.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Jamestown revealed: History comes alive
  2. Saturday essay: Garden chances
  3. Kittanning Laurels & Lances
  4. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  5. The Connellsville Redevelopment Authority: Facts & findings
  6. Regional growth
  7. Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
  8. The Brady affair: Contract law
  9. Dodd-Frank turns 5: What a mess
  10. U.N. Watch: The ‘race’ is on
  11. Greensburg Laurels & Lances