Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, Sept. 9, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
What a mess: Some scoffed at our suggestion that the Pittsburgh Steelers would be worse than last year and go 6-10 this year. After Sunday's embarrassing 16-9 loss to Tennessee, we're starting to feel as if we were too optimistic. And adding insult to ineptitude are the losses of starting center Maurkice Pouncey and linebacker and defensive leader Larry Foote. They're out for the season. One can only wonder if a certain offensive coordinator isn't long for this team if things don't quickly get turned around.
The end?: The Pirates were swept out of first place in the National League Central over the weekend by the St. Louis Cardinals. Now the Battlin' Bucs are struggling to hold onto second place in the division, tussling with the Cincinnati Reds. And the collapse couldn't have come at a worse time — for the Pirates in the heat of the pennant race or for The Toledo, Ohio, Block Bugler, which editorialized Friday that the Pirates' expected first winning season in two decades, and after a dozen years in PNC Park, is a solid argument for taxpayer-funded stadiums. And the Award for Most Serpentine Logic in Defense of a Taxpayer End Around goes to ... .
Just so you know: Citing Census Bureau data, Business Insider says half of the United States is clustered in 146 of the biggest counties out of more than 3,000 counties. Among them, Allegheny County. We're not sure what value this information has other than to allow folks to say “We're one of 'em.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- The Adegbile nomination: Rejecting race-baiting
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- Common Core: Garbage in, garbage out
- The Thursday wrap
- The Russian invasion: Sanctions, now
- The IRS scandal: Compelling Lerner
- Corbett’s fortunes: Troubling truths
- Another EPA crock: Sulfur silliness
- Saturday essay: Coyote showdown?