Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
Lance: To the August Wilson Center. The financially struggling black culture center says “frequent and inaccurate reporting by particular media sources” is among five factors that have hurt the center. That sounds like an excuse for the poor management under which the center has suffered from day one.
Lance: To UPMC. It's running a wholly misleading TV ad that essentially blames Highmark for being the more expensive out-of-network provider option. Never mind that UPMC won't sign a contract that would keep Highmark as a less expensive in-network option.
Lance: To Mike Tomlin. The Steelers head coach says his team was “an explosive play or two” away from actually being in last Sunday's abysmal loss to Tennessee. Now, we understand that cliches are part and parcel to “coach-talk.” But, seriously, Coach, living in denial serves no useful purpose.
Lance: To teacher strikes. The union cudgel prevailed in the Shaler Area School District. Teachers agreed to return to class in exchange for binding arbitration on salary matters. And why not? It's a process that typically favors teachers unions. Outlawing teacher strikes would favor taxpayers forced to pay for this bias.
Lance: To state police. Its crackdown against solo motorists using the Parkway North's HOV lanes led to a massive traffic jam on Wednesday. The cops blame rubberneckers in the regular lanes. We prefer to blame a bad policy that maintains the ruse that these HOV lanes are efficacious to begin with.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.