Share This Page

Sunday pops

| Saturday, Sept. 14, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Russian President Vladimir Putin warned in a Thursday New York Times commentary — “placed,” by the way, by Pittsburgh-founded Ketchum public relations — that a U.S. strike against Syria “would increase violence and unleash a new wave of terrorism.” Underwritten and directed, no doubt, by Mr. Putin and his merry band of thugs. ... Economist Robert Samuelson reminds that raising the minimum wage is no “shortcut to social justice.” That's because doing so hurts the very people its proponents claim to be helping by reducing the jobs pool. It's the kind of fundamental economics for which “progressives” continually show they have no aptitude. ... Manhattan Institute senior fellow Robert Bryce says he'd hate to imagine what U.S. unemployment would be like without the “shale gale,” the surge in natural gas and oil production from Marcellus, Utica and other shale formations. And the drop in natural gas prices alone because of it is saving consumers $210 million per day or $77 billion per year. Frack, baby, frack. ... A funny thing has happened on the way to the polar ice caps melting and inundating our coastal cities. The National Snow and Ice Data Center says 1 million more square miles of ocean are covered in ice this year versus last. Which has prompted University of Wisconsin researcher Anastasios Tsonis to note that the Earth is in a cooling phase that could last for at least the next 15 years. And what do we say, class, upon learning of such news? All together now: “Throw another log on the fire, honey. It's getting cold outside.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.