TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Putin & Syria: What's he up to?

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

The good news appears to be that President Obama won't be ordering our military to fire a cruise missile or two up the proverbial camel's hiney in some Syrian tent. At least not in the immediate future.

But the bad news appears to be that few have a clear picture of what nut-covering operation that squirrel known as Russia's Vladimir Putin is engaged in.

Mr. Obama took to the airwaves Tuesday night in the equivalent of a “Yeah, that's the ticket” address to the nation. Initially requested as an attempt to make the case for striking at Syria for its alleged chemical weapons attack, it was downgraded to a scrambling exercise in catching up to Mr. Putin's opportunistic bluff-call of Secretary of State John Kerry for his off-the-cuff — but self-dismissed — talk of Bashar Assad relinquishing any chemical weapons to international control and, ultimately, their destruction.

While it might have given Obama a political cover from certain congressional rejection of his attack authorization request, his embrace of the Putin plan (no matter that embrace being akin to a Hollywood air kiss) poses significant risks of its own.

“I am deeply skeptical about the motivation of the Russians and the viability of their plan to place Syria's chemical weapons under international control,” said Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa. And with good reason, considering much of the stockpile likely is Russian-engineered and/or -supplied to begin with.

While we don't know what Putin's true motivations are, it's a good bet they are not designed to benefit the United States. And it's a given that they are not intended to rid Syria of Assad.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Mon-Yough Tuesday takes
  2. Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
  3. Greensburg Tuesday takes
  4. The wind ruse: A failed policy
  5. Yes, the IRS targeted conservatives
  6. The Export-Import Bank: The Senate’s shame
  7. Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
  8. U.N. Watch: The ‘race’ is on
  9. At the VA: The waiting dead
  10. Grabbing guns: Obama overreach?
  11. The Box