Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
Lance: To the Allegheny Valley School Board. The board may waste money, but not time. After deciding last month to keep the Colfax Upper Elementary open, the board is already making plans to spend untold millions to fix up the school. Oh, but the money for a new roof, we're told, is from a previous bond issue — the leftovers from the unnecessary $25 million spent to renovate the junior-senior high. Our AVSB checklist: enrollment, down; state subsidies, down; property values, down; district population, down; spending, up! Ridiculous.
Laurel: To recycling. Not only is Hedin Environmental of Pittsburgh cleaning out acid mine treatment ponds along the Kiski River, it's turning the rust into profit. Hedin cleans and dries the dark orange sludge and sells it. Some of it has ended up as the coloring in Crayola “burnt sienna” crayons. Now that's repurposing.
Lance: To UPMC. It's running a wholly misleading TV ad that essentially blames Highmark for being the more expensive out-of-network provider option. Never mind that UPMC won't sign a contract that would keep Highmark as a less expensive in-network option.
Lance: To Mike Tomlin. The Steelers head coach says his team was “an explosive play or two” away from actually being in last Sunday's abysmal loss to Tennessee. Now, we understand that cliches are part and parcel to “coach-talk.” But, seriously, Coach, living in denial serves no useful purpose.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.