Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
Lance: To the Pittsburgh Cultural Trust. It's trying to bully Joe Wos, executive director of the ToonSeum (in the Cultural District) to stop selling his “Quack N' At” T-shirts, an ode to the trust's giant floating “The Rubber Duck” exhibit coming to town next week. There's no copyright or trademark infringement here. But it appears as if the Cultural Trust wants total control over any and all promotion of what's really a public art event. And the trust's tacit threat that Mr. Wos will pay a price for exercising his artistic freedom is beneath it.
On the “Watch List”:
• The Pittsburgh Steelers. They continued to look anemic (and that's being kind) in Monday night's 20-10 loss to the Cincinnati Bengals. The offense, save quarterback Ben Roethlisberger, couldn't save Big Ben. The defense was flaccid. And the 2-0 Chicago Bears, who beat the Bengals in their mutual opener, are in town Sunday night. Steeler Nation is feeling quite blue at 0-2 and wondering what coach(es) will be set free should Monday next dawn at 0-3.
• The Pittsburgh Pirates. The Battlin' Buccos soon, hopefully, are expected to clinch their first playoff berth since 1992. And in preparation, the team has the celebratory champagne ready to pop. That's all fine and dandy but might we suggest goggles all around (for obvious reasons) and more than a few extra rubs on those antique Green Weenies (to remove the jinx of all this bubbly talk)?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.