Police chief's role: Law, order & more
Published: Friday, Sept. 20, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
Kittanning Mayor Kirk Atwood is appropriately concerned that borough council disregarded early money-saving plans and decided to hire a full-time police chief.
Council members in a 7-0 vote approved a new contract with Chief Bruce Mathews last week that pays him about $65,000 a year. They say things are looking up financially as the new budget-writing season begins.
The role of police chief is vital in towns like Kittanning and similar locales. It's especially necessary when so many towns rely on part-time officers to provide nearly 'round-the-clock coverage.
But there is more.
A police chief becomes a local, recognizable figure in a town, and that's important when the political leadership changes often and police protection is one of the most vital functions a borough or township provides.
The chief is the person citizens go to when they're concerned about break-ins, disturbances, nuisance locations, etc. And the chief sets the emphasis and direction for the department.
A chief therein becomes the main public relations person for local government — more so than elected officials.
And the chief typically works with neighboring communities and with state police.
There may come a time when discussions with neighboring towns about joint police coverage will take place, and the police chief will be a key figure in such talks.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Accord in Geneva: Smelly side deals, too
- Corrections reinvention
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- What’s that smell?: WAMs return to Harrisburg
- Anti-fracking scandal: More junk ‘science’
- ‘Merit selection’ for judges? No thank you
- The Ecotality mess: Lying by omission
- Thanksgiving 2013: Pausing in unison
- The coming holidays: Get out & enjoy
- Saturday essay: Taylor’s trains
- Sunday pops