TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The Benghazi report: Conflicts & obstruction

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | Photo Reprints

Daily Photo Galleries


By The Tribune-Review

Published: Friday, Sept. 20, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

A supposedly independent State Department report on the fatal Sept. 11, 2012, debacle at the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya, was tainted by conflicts of interest and willful obstruction, according to the House Oversight & Government Reform Committee.

A committee report obtained by The Hill newspaper says Accountability Review Board (ARB) members and those who selected them had “actual and perceived conflicts of interest” with State. It also says the ARB didn't “record or transcribe” interviews and State still refuses to provide summaries of those interviews, despite a subpoena issued in August by committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif.

The Hill says State and Obama administration leaders “wholeheartedly accepted” the ARB report — which did call the Benghazi assault a terrorist attack, not a protest sparked by an anti-Muslim video, and criticized outpost security — even though the ARB's co-chairmen said the panel's mandate compromised its work. And four State officials placed on administrative leave at the ARB's recommendation were reinstated by Secretary John Kerry.

Committee Republicans suspect the ARB protected his predecessor at State, likely 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, and other top administration officials. State's continued stonewalling suggests that protection continues — and that the public has yet to learn the full truth about the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. The Obama/Biden visit: Oh, the irony
  2. The Nevada standoff
  3. Another IPCC warning: More sci-fi
  4. Greensburg Tuesday takes
  5. Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
  6. Alle-Kiski Tuesday Takes
  7. Kathleen Kane attacks the free press
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.