| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Common Core: Diluting education

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Wednesday, Sept. 18, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

When the debate over Common Core school standards came to a Franklin Regional High School forum, proponents lauded this latest attempt at academic excellence through central planning and critics challenged the farming out of so-called “standards” to a bureaucracy far removed from any school district.

And Pennsylvania ups that ante with standards that supposedly are more rigorous than what's found nationally, says acting Education Secretary Carolyn Dumaresq. Really? Panelist Ze'ev Wurman, a former U.S. Department of Education official, called the commonwealth's standards “a diluted, dumbed-down version.”

To wit, testing “proficient” in Algebra 1 is the bar set for students supposedly ready for college-level work. But “proficiency” in Algebra 1 alone isn't enough to prepare students for a community college, Mr. Wurman said.

Joan Benso, president of the Pennsylvania Partnerships for Children, says Common Core sets “a floor for consistency.” It's the same central-planning argument made by every education bureaucrat since Jimmy Carter's federal Department of Education bowed. Relegating education standards — let alone local control — to a bureaucracy is the reason public education is “broken at its root,” says Peg Luksik, a former consultant with the federal education department.

As demonstrated at this forum, and at debates around the country, the case against Common Core is far more convincing than any argument in support of it.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Regional growth
  2. So, where’s the I-70 ‘Welcome to Pennsylvania’ sign on the Pa.-W.Va. border?
  3. Yes, the IRS targeted conservatives
  4. The Fiat Chrysler mess: Government’s virus
  5. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  6. Council fails again: Shoot straight, Ford City
  7. The Export-Import Bank: The Senate’s shame
  8. The wind ruse: A failed policy
  9. Mon-Yough Tuesday takes
  10. Greensburg Tuesday takes
  11. Pittsburgh Tuesday takes