Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
Laurel: To Steve Zappala. The Allegheny County district attorney says John Rozgonyi of Munhall will not be charged in the shooting death of one of two men attempting to burgle his garage. Burglar Andrew Stevens fired on Mr. Rozgonyi when confronted and he fired back. It was a classic case of self-defense, Mr. Zappala says. “If somebody engages you in deadly force, you can return deadly force,” he notes. Case closed.
Lance: To Pennsylvania. It's offering the very profitable PPG Industries $4 million in grants, tax credits and loans to consolidate its North American architectural coatings business and headquarter it in Cranberry. But isn't PPG's coatings division the company's profit pacer? And while new jobs will come to Pennsylvania — others will be transferred from downtown Pittsburgh to Cranberry — jobs will be lost in other states. Taxpayers should not be underwriting chair-shuffling.
Laurel: To the Port Authority. Allegheny County's mass-transit agency is selling, and companies are snapping up, advertising on buses and at “T” stations. In fact, ad revenue is up nearly 12 percent over fiscal 2012. And that's good news from an agency that typically relies too heavily on taxpayer subsidies.
Lance: To Josh Wander. The Republican candidate for Pittsburgh mayor in the Nov. 5 election has sold his Squirrel Hill house for a rental and taken his family with him on the work road in Israel and who knows where else. But Mr. Wander, 42, insists he's still a serious candidate, that his campaign staff will be his proxy while he's gone and that he'll be back in town for a series of debates and Election Day. Is this a joke? Consider it a rhetorical question.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Moody’s downgrade: Inaction’s price
- An ObamaCare ‘re-do’?
- The IRS scandal: Is a shocking new email the smoking cannon?
- The federal budget: Here we go again
- The flood of illegals: Misplaced blame