Greensburg Laurels & Lances
Laurel: To Westmoreland County trailblazers. Acquiring 10 miles of former rail line will eventually link the Westmoreland County Heritage Trail to the Great Allegheny Passage, which runs between Pittsburgh and Washington, D.C. County officials are confident that the projected $3 million cost will be privately financed, just as much of the county's park system is funded. Long in the works, what's proposed is great news for Westmoreland's many bikers and hikers.
On the “Watch List”: Latrobe's 2014 budget. It comes as no surprise that the city is facing some tough decisions after previous projections of doom and gloom. Service cuts along with tax increases appear likely. But given that grim outlook, what has the city done since the last budget to improve its economic outlook, say through cost-sharing with neighboring municipalities? Unfortunately, and not just in Latrobe, some municipal leaders spend more time cursing the iceberg in front of them than charting a course around it.
An observation: Those fancy radio-enabled water meters being installed by the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County, which allow meter readings without entering customers' homes, are billed as money-savers. But they also raise some suspicion at a time when government suspicion is warranted. For example, could these meters perhaps one day be used to control residents' water usage? The “why” behind this upgrade deserves more than a pat answer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- James Foley, 1973-2014: Fighting on
- The Thursday wrap
- More foreign aid is no answer to border problem
- School funding canard: Money isn’t the answer
- Rick Perry’s indictment: The real abuse
- Another carbon credit scheme