ShareThis Page

Saturday essay: That time again

| Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

This being October, thoughts have turned to more than just how much fall lettuce can be coaxed out of the garden before the first hard freeze hits, or how much soup stock (also augmented with garden goodies) can be put up for the coming winter, or what mixes of what woods will produce the best fires inside with the best smells outside.

Yes, thoughts have turned once again to getting the N-scale train platform ready for its Christmas run.

A new eight-line platform bowed last year and ran remarkably well. But as any model railroader knows, there's always need and/or room for maintenance, revisions and expansion.

The work this year will range from the mundane (removing a few pesky track nails in a tunnel that love to work their way above track level and stop cold the steam locomotive pulling a consist of full coal cars), to the intricate (adding trolley line poles, catenaries and power lines on the light-rail vehicle tracks that traverse the mountain town), to the major (building a large, curved trestle bridge ­— or perhaps it will be a concrete arch bridge — to make one of the freight lines longer and more sweeping).

And the work just might border on the bolder — two additional long lines on the outside of the platform featuring newly acquired diesel engines and rolling stock.

But however the work about to commence ends, the junior engineer doing it will have that model railroader's smile of smiles on his face as the updated platform bows just after Thanksgiving.

— Colin McNickle

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.