Ben Carson, the world-renowned pediatric neurosurgeon who challenged President Barack Obama's prescription for America while sharing the same dais at a public function, says he was subjected to an IRS audit months later. It's a story we've heard all too often regarding this administration. It is the definition of tyranny. ... James Clapper, the director of National Intelligence, says the government shutdown is compromising national security. He says it creates an environment ripe for foreign intelligence services to recruit laid-off federal employees as spies. Which doesn't say much for those federal employees. ... Former Democrat Congressman Ron Klink says he thought reports in the political punditocracy that he was considering a run for Pennsylvania lieutenant governor were “a bad joke.” Psssst! Ron! So did the voters. ... The national toll-free number for those seeking ObamaCare coverage is 1-800-318-2596. But as The Daily Caller points out, six of the last seven numbers, when replaced with the telephone buttons' letters, loosely spell a decidedly obscene phrase. (OK, pause here as you do the decryption. Got it figured out? OK, you may continue to read.) Consider it a metaphor for how the Obama administration really feels about the American people. ... A Thursday Toledo, Ohio, Block Bugler editorial on the government shutdown set a new low for carrying water for Barry & the Dimmycrats, right down to the kind of gun rhetoric over which The Bugler would go ballistic if employed by Republicans. Hypocrisy in defense of idiocy now is a virtue for the spittle producers.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.