| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The Keystone pipeline: Reject the wackos

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Saturday, Oct. 5, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Even if builders of the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada ensure by all means possible that it would not increase so-called carbon emissions, per President Obama's ultimatum, Gang Green insists that Mr. Obama must not sign this deal.

And even though Canadian leaders now are pledging stepped-up cooperation with the United States on reducing emissions from petroleum development, that's still not good enough for the environmental hard-liners.

A new missive signed by 25 environmental/liberal groups “oppose any deal-making” and insist — no matter how many U.S. studies prove otherwise — that the Keystone pipeline is an irredeemable hazard, The Hill newspaper reports.

Never mind that the State Department's own draft report concluded that the pipeline would not significantly increase carbon emissions.

Should Obama give in to these wackos, the threat of environmental catastrophe will increase exponentially as Canada's oil instead will be loaded aboard Chinese tankers. It will be destined for refining where the China National Petroleum Corp. and China Petrochemical Corp. (known as Sinopec Group) have resisted costly upgrades to reduce pollutants, The Wall Street Journal reports.

Groups supposedly concerned about alleged environmental damage should be pressing for the safer, superior Keystone pipeline instead of the grim consequences if the pipeline isn't completed.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Greensburg Tuesday takes
  2. Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
  3. Mon-Yough Tuesday takes
  4. Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
  5. Grabbing guns: Obama overreach?
  6. The Export-Import Bank: The Senate’s shame
  7. Dodd-Frank turns 5: What a mess
  8. The wind ruse: A failed policy
  9. At the VA: The waiting dead
  10. The Thursday wrap
  11. Medicaid’s boomerang: Duck!