Common Core's common deception
One of the many falsehoods of Common Core national school standards is that this latest “fix” for what ails public education is entirely state-directed, as the states themselves, including Pennsylvania, have opted in. Just pay no attention to the edtocracy that developed and is now instituting these standards across the country.
That includes President Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan, who met with 40 CEOs at the recent Business Roundtable to “boost” Common Core, according to Education Week.
The Obama administration has been pushing Common Core from the get-go. Now pitching it to America's business leaders as the means by which “every young person” will gain the “opportunity to get prepared for the kinds of jobs that are going to exist in the 21st century” — in Mr. Obama's words — is duplicitous.
Common Core, with its top-down approach to education, is the antithesis of a free-market, competitive system in which businesses, and the individuals they employ, succeed, writes Lindsey Burke for The Heritage Foundation.
It has gained momentum not because of any public mandate. Based on the most recent PDK-Gallup poll, 62 percent of Americans still don't even know what Common Core is.
And rather than offer anything new or innovative, Common Core school standards amount to the same old centralization that, ultimately, removes parents, teachers and school districts from any decision-making in children's education.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.