ShareThis Page

Election 2013: Invigoration needed

| Friday, Oct. 11, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

In little more than three weeks, you can go to a polling place near you and decide who will lead the government in your borough or township.

For the most part, these elections of council members, mayors and township supervisors have been popularity contests.

If you don't know the candidates, you may not even vote. There is little “celebrity” attraction elsewhere on the ballots, unless you consider the leadership qualities offered by candidates for sheriff or coroner — both important offices, but they do not make policy decisions.

What would enliven this political process in your community?

Candidates need to stand out from the pack and offer one or two creative ideas such as:

• finding ways to encourage more public involvement in municipal business, creating time at public meetings for looking ahead and airing new ideas;

• developing rapport with neighboring leaders and exploring cooperative efforts;

• using the visibility of an elected position to draw attention to community efforts that are not normally the “duties” of a council member, supervisor or mayor.

Recently we have seen examples of such creativity. Developers Larry Nelson and Ed Evans are turning the Shannock Valley High School into a youth center. And Kittanning Police Chief Bruce Mathews held a free spaghetti dinner to reinvigorate the borough's crime-watch program.

There are creative ideas to be shared, and for the best candidates to make them known.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.