ShareThis Page

Sunday pops

| Saturday, Oct. 12, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Barack Obama was against raising the debt limit before he was for it, of course. In 2006, then-Sen. Obama said such a move shifted “the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.” Giddyup, kiddies, the president has changed his mind and saddled you up. ... Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius was a train wreck on Jon Stewart's Monday show. She steadfastly evaded Mr. Stewart's attempt to pin her down over the selective — and we would argue patently illegal — enforcement of ObamaCare. It's further proof of an administration that works overtime to evade the truth it refuses to tell. ... MSNBC's Chris Hayes says our constitutional form of government is flawed because it restricts the government's ability to act quickly enough in some cases. But as's Michael Schaus reminds, what Mr. Hayes appears to be pining for — giving the state carte blanche authority to fast-track its wants — is nothing more than fascism. No wonder so few watch MSNBC. ... The Washington Post says the results of the presidential election in Azerbaijan were announced a full day before balloting even took place. Anybody doubt that U.S. “progressives” are licking their lips, carefully taking notes and trying to figure out how to mimic the feat?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.