ShareThis Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, Oct. 14, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Central Catholic's conundrum: The firing of Greensburg Central Catholic Principal Denise Myers over “financial irregularities” has further fueled a firestorm among some parents since she was removed from her duties on Sept. 23. An independent audit confirms the findings of an internal audit, according to the Diocese of Greensburg, although no charges have been filed against Ms. Myers. Obviously there are legal considerations in play, and the suggestion by some of her supporters that she's being “bullied” out is without basis. By the same token, parents who sacrifice to send their children to the junior-senior high school deserve a full explanation of the nature and extent of the so-called “irregularities.”

A troubling “foothold”: Testimony before the state House Subcommittee on Crime and Corrections that Mexican drug cartels are targeting Western Pennsylvania is troubling news for Westmoreland County, where overdose deaths set a record last year. And with the heroin epidemic comes an increase in other crimes by addicts, including thefts and robberies, said District Attorney John Peck. Think this trend won't affect you? When dope dealers find a new “market” (or neighborhood), they infest it like cockroaches.

A call for help: A person doesn't have to climb ladders to volunteer at a fire company. Business skills are also needed. Consider the West Newton Volunteer Fire Co. A bank is suing the volunteers for selling a fire truck supposedly for about $25,000 less than what the fire company owed on it. What's alleged is a different kind of shortage: It's a deficit of financial management.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.