The ObamaCare treatment: Hold on to your wallets
ObamaCare's only a few weeks old, but mounting evidence of its outrageous cost hikes, especially for Americans who buy their own insurance plans, will be a bitter pill for Democrats to swallow.
How many Dimmycrats are going to stand up and defend that which so many ran away from in the 2012 and 2010 elections?
Among reports of premium price spikes, Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee have been compiling angry posts about ObamaCare's sticker shock from the HealthCare.gov Facebook account, The Hill newspaper reports.
Under the Affordable Care Act, health care providers must offer a “basic level of coverage,” which the Obama administration acknowledges will raise premiums for some patients, according to The Hill.
But ObamaCare's proponents say higher premiums “alone” don't tell the whole story. Why, there are savings to be realized on plan deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums.
Tell that to the fella whose premium for a family of five jumped from $789 per month to $1,700. Or the woman who said her premium shot up from $289 to $855.
Based on the government's sample of rates, premiums go up 121 percent for 27-year-old males and 62 percent for same-aged females in the Pittsburgh area, according to the Commonwealth Foundation.
The nightmare that is ObamaCare is just beginning. From this, Democrats in next year's congressional elections can run — but they cannot hide.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Solyndra scandal: Government culpability
- Sunday pops
- The Box
- Ford City facts: Blaming the messenger
- President Carbon: Hypocrisy’s trip
- Hogtying a terrorist: Heroes step up
- The Pa. pensions debate: Union hypocrisy
- Saturday essay: Cusps of change
- Laurels & Lances
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- Greater Pittsburgh’s ‘brain gain’