Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
“House money” or bust: Having completed $1 million in renovations to reconfigure gambling options, officials of the 4-year-old Rivers Casino are considering adding a hotel as another way to better compete with six other casinos within a two-hour drive. It's a fine idea to explore — but only if it doesn't involve public subsidies like those that local “leaders” long have insisted are necessary to add a hotel to the David L. Lawrence Convention Center. If the Rivers Casino wants to gamble on demand for lodging, it should do so with its own “house money,” not taxpayers'.
Share the responsibility: Despite unauthorized vehicles not being allowed along the route of Pittsburgh's 28th annual Columbus Day parade on Saturday morning, a bicyclist decided to use Liberty Avenue's outbound bike lane anyway — and knocked down — and knocked out — a parade-participant pedestrian. Police say charges against the bicyclist, who also was injured, will reflect the severity of the pedestrian's injuries. It's a case that should remind the two-wheeled “share the road” crowd that it also shares responsibility for obeying all traffic laws.
Pulse detected: With Sunday's 19-6 win over the Jets, the Steelers avoided utter playoff irrelevancy after their 0-4 start. With the Bengals leading the AFC North at 4-2, the Browns at 3-3, the Ravens, also 3-3, due at Heinz Field next Sunday and plenty of divisional games left after that, the Steelers' hopes remain alive — but it will take near-flawless play the rest of the way for them to salvage this season.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.