Greensburg Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Oct. 17, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
On the “Watch List”: The latest Monessen “revitalization” plan. Westmoreland County commissioners have accepted a $400,000 state grant that will help finance the purchase of tax-delinquent properties and could assist with the construction and financing of low-income housing. But where's the private interest/investment in this plan? Who's going to live in the new housing? Where are newcomers going to find work? Before there can be any government “pump priming,” there must first be a pump to prime.
Laurel: To standing up to their school board. It's been several weeks since a state audit alleged that some Greensburg Salem administrators spiked six former employees' pensions. Some residents, rightfully so, are pressing the board for answers. Board President Ron Mellinger says everything will be made public — eventually. There are “legal considerations.” We remind school directors that the longer this unmitigated mess festers without an explanation, the darker their black eye gets.
Lance: To stupidity on display, Despite the embarrassment and investigations stemming from “sexting,” some teens still haven't learned that sending nude photos of themselves via their cellphones is the techno-manifestation of fatuity. The latest alleged case involves five Hempfield Area High School students. Even if today's young exhibitionists don't get caught sharing intimate photos, does it dawn on them that with one click, these digital images can end up anywhere — and everywhere?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- The new SAT: Rigor gets a pass
- Sunday pops
- THE BOX
- Fixing Ford City’s water leaks: Time is money
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Saturday essay: The gardeners’ etiquette
- Corbett’s fortunes: Troubling truths
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- The Thursday wrap
- Another EPA crock: Sulfur silliness