Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Oct. 24, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
An observation: Environmental protesters, many from the Power Shift 2013 conference, clogged myriad Downtown streets on Monday. They don't like coal. They don't like fracking. After all, they're environmentalists. Trouble is, they also clogged traffic for several hours, which, of course, created more pollution. Turns out they also don't like common sense.
A question: When the overpaid muckety-mucks at VisitPittsburgh calculate the benefits of the conferences it books at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center, will it also do the right thing and calculate the costs to businesses and taxpayers for the Power Shift 2013 cluster-cluck?
On the “Watch List”: Allegheny County Council. It's considering a proposal to give the insolvent August Wilson Center for African American Culture half-a-million bucks. But the center, heavily publicly subsidized and mismanaged from the beginning, should not be given one more cent of public money until it can prove it's worthy. And that's going to take some doing.
Here we go: The 2-4 Pittsburgh Steelers hope to continue to salvage their 2013 season Sunday in Oakland against the Raiders, also 2-4. The kick is at 4:05 p.m. The great twist to this game is that Jeannette's Terrelle Pryor, who left Ohio State in scandal, will be calling the signals for Oakland. It promises to be a good matchup. And should the Steelers prevail, look for the rallying cry to become “We're kinda, sorta, well, you know, almost back!”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Junk nutrition
- The secret ballot: Protect it
- Lever A-1: Pot-infused brownies
- Sunday pops
- Liquor privatization: Now’s the time
- THE BOX
- Another IPCC warning: More sci-fi
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- Keystone caper: Pipeline politics
- The big sting: To what end?