Saturday essay: Transitions
Real fall arrived this week with that telltale whoosh bearing the scents of the winter to come. And while the winds that conveyed the chill signaled the inevitable transition long overdue, it is a transition far from complete.
The bumper autumn harvest of raised-bed lettuces and arugula continues. But their thinning ranks and the specter of a first heavy frost mark their days.
The fall peas finally have flowered. Hardy as they are, they might just produce enough green pearls for a few stews or soups. But even if they don't, the nitrogen they've left in the soil is worth their weight in gold.
As soon as the frosts have taken all, clear plastic sheets will be stapled down to facilitate “sunitizing” of the beds ravaged by early blight.
Meanwhile, in the greenhouse, the pepper plants that have been producing prodigiously for six months are wooded, wilted and spent. With a quite modest amount of heat, the extra greens and peas and herbs therein should add a real touch of freshness to the holiday dinner table.
But as the deep cold of January forces dormancy on even the greenhouse, the gardener will be spied in an upstairs window — illuminated by the glow of a single light, hunched over the seed catalogs — dreaming of another growing season set to bow long before the winter wanes, the spring waxes and the grackles return.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Open records: Hold the phone?
- The atom smasher
- U.N. Watch: Climate games
- Sunday pops
- Jesse White’s chutzpah
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- The Arneson firing: Legally dubious
- Saturday essay: The thumb itches
- Snow shovelers needed: A call for volunteers
- Shenango shakedown: Public money at risk
- The Obama foreign policy ‘model’ imperils the world.