The Obama administration has called on supposedly tech-savvy scholars to fix those insufferable ObamaCare websites. A pimply techno-dweeb kid all of 14 could have done the job better in the first place, could fix the mess better now and for 1⁄264th of the cost. ... The way Washington works, mystery-no-more National Security Council tweeter Jofi Joseph, the former Bob Casey staffer fired by the White House after his identity was exposed, eventually will land on his feet — most likely as the Third Deputy Undersecretary to the First Oversecretary for Illegal Private Use of Email for Public Affairs. ... Judicial Watch reports that taxpayers will give the Baltimore Ravens $130,000 to promote ObamaCare. Considering the hundreds of million of dollars in taxpayer money that the Ravens have shaken from the public tree to date, the least they could do is promote this train wreck pro bono. ... Students at the University of Colorado Boulder have been told to avoid certain Halloween costumes. Among them are cowboy costumes. A university mouthpiece calls them a “crude stereotype.” Some folks have too much time on their hands, not to mention too much public money in their pockets. ... Seattle City Council has voted unanimously to seize a privately owned parking lot — through eminent domain against its 103-year-old owner — and turn it into a government-owned parking lot. And our “leaders” really wonder why the word “revolution” is on the tip of so many tongues.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.