Connellsville's budget: A matter of trust
Is Connellsville facing a financial crisis?
City officials next week will meet to plan for the 2014 budget. There's no question that they will face some difficult budgeting choices.
Some council members have hinted that the upcoming budget sessions will be a challenge, and leaders may have to decide whether to raise taxes — and if so, by how much. Connellsville property owners have not had a tax increase in more than 20 years.
Nevertheless, city officials must look at all options when planning for Connellsville's financial future. This may also mean looking at cuts in some areas.
Most important, this means developing a realistic spending plan.
We realize planning a municipal budget is not an easy job. There are contracts that must be followed, along with state and federal mandates.
Our city leaders must look closely at what the city is bringing in, what is going out — and where the money is going. Overestimating or hoping for unrealized revenue is not responsible budgeting.
Residents of Connellsville have put their trust in elected officials to do their best to protect the city. Preparing a professional, reasonable and realistic spending plan is a big part of that trust.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Calling out Russia: But weakly
- The Thursday wrap
- The Western Psych grand jury report: Do the right thing
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Palmer v. District of Columbia: Upholding the 2nd Amendment
- The China question
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- Sunday pops
- Digitized medical records: They’ve become an unsecured threat
- A Pa. Senate lawsuit?: The claptrap of connivers
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes