For Westmoreland County district attorney: Re-elect John Peck
In District Attorney John Peck, Westmoreland County's top prosecutor since December 1994, residents have a champion for justice whose case for re-election couldn't be more clear.
Among some of Westmoreland's more recent high-profile cases, Mr. Peck, 66, a Democrat of New Kensington, has successfully prosecuted three defendants in the horrific torture and murder of Jennifer Daugherty in Greensburg. Two of them, Ricky Smyrnes and Melvin Knight, have been condemned to death.
He also obtained a conviction and death sentence for Kevin Murphy in the shooting deaths of his mother, sister and aunt. And last month, he successfully prosecuted Eric Hall for the murder of a Washington Township couple.
For the past two decades, in fact, Peck, has prosecuted virtually all the county's top cases.
His challenger, Republican Peter Borghetti, 55, of Murrysville, an attorney with a Pittsburgh law firm, says Westmoreland County needs new leadership in the DA's office “to protect our constitutional rights.” The incumbent already has done so and, through his hard work, has consistently secured justice for the people he represents.
Case closed. On Nov. 5, re-elect John Peck.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Blaming Israel: A new low
- The Justice Department’s improper political agenda
- The Chevy Volt: Short-circuited (again)
- Digitized medical records: They’ve become an unsecured threat