Share This Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, Oct. 28, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Sending the right message: Former Monessen Treasurer Frank “Bucky” Rizzuto, a 26-year city fixture, was sentenced to a year of probation for skimming $470 from parking meter money. What he didn't get from the county District Attorney's Office was the option to enroll in a program that would have wiped clean his criminal record. Whether he took $400 or $400,000, he was an elected official who trampled the public trust. And for that breach there should be no easy out, offered or applied.

Amnesty for library scofflaws: Eighteen Westmoreland County libraries are making an offer that neglectful patrons cannot refuse: For the week of Nov. 3-9, they'll see their fines forgiven if they return overdue books, movies and CDs — dating back to 2008 — and donate a food item, which will go to the Westmoreland County Food Bank. Here's hoping this will reduce the backlog of more than 11,000 missing materials, which add up to a significant cost. Besides, those overdue items aren't doing scofflaws any good gathering dust in their homes.

Battery check: Members of a Ligonier Township family escaped tragedy last week when they were roused by their home's smoke detectors during an early morning fire. Fire officials said it's a “textbook example” of why they urge people to change the batteries in their smoke detectors at this time of year. Most people tend to wait until their smoke detectors “chirp” with a weak-battery signal. Simply swapping out batteries on a regular schedule makes considerably more sense.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.