The Thursday wrap
The deals that Penn State struck with 26 victims of sexual abuse at the hands of convicted former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky are sealed under a confidentiality agreement. Buncombe! This is a public institution that enjoys significant public subsidies. The university says insurance — not tuition, not taxpayers and not donations — will pay the settlements. So, who pays the insurance premiums? You can bet it wasn't The Great Pumpkin. ... Financial mavens close to President Obama — including, reportedly, Federal Reserve Chairwoman-nominee Janet Yellen — are said to be pining for a bit of inflation. They're under the impression that a little inflation (not much different from being a little bit pregnant) would be a good thing for the still-struggling economy. But as Victor Davis Hanson reminds, writing in National Review Online, even a slight rise in the inflation rate “would make servicing the huge debt nearly unmanageable.” Ms. Yellen & Co. should be careful what they wish for. ... Here's the latest from the spy wars: The national intelligence director says the White House, despite assertions to the contrary, was fully aware of the National Security Agency's foreign eavesdropping efforts. But a British newspaper reports that European intelligence services pretty much handed over to the NSA the material it sought, despite Europe's outrage over the public revelations. Spycraft meets statecraft meets stagecraft.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.