Election 2013: Vote!
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Nov. 1, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
It's always ironic that so few people turn out for municipal elections. A pittance of votes put into office the people whose actions most directly touch our lives. Yet presidential elections draw so many more voters, attracted by the continuous drumbeat of national news in all its forms.
This coming Tuesday we will select some borough mayors, borough council members and township supervisors. For the most part, school board seats were decided in the primary.
As a registered voter, you may think: I don't know these people. I don't have any issues with local government. I am too busy to vote.
Thus, what we so rarely hear at public meetings of these local government bodies is a citizen saying, “I voted for you and …” or “I didn't vote for you, but … .”
Voting gives your opinion a little more credibility when you want to get your council members or supervisors or mayor to act on your behalf.
We can hope that some of the people on the ballot Tuesday will bring to office a newfound desire to promote involvement in what they do. There is limited money available and the decisions are more difficult, making citizen direction even more valuable.
Vote this Tuesday, then decide what needs to be done in your borough or township and find a way — direct contact, emails, letters, comments at public meetings — to promote local action.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- The Malaysian jetliner probe: Passport insecurity
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- The market speaks: Cadillac dealers reject another electric folly
- Market perversions: Chrysler retreats
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- The Thursday wrap
- The new SAT: Rigor gets a pass
- The CBO exposes the fallacies of hiking the minimum wage
- Common Core: Garbage in, garbage out