The Consol sale: A bet foretold
Consider it another watershed moment in the sea change that is sweeping America's energy sector.
Consol Energy Inc., the venerable coal giant of Pittsburgh, which traces its antecedents to the Mellon family, is selling off more than half of its coal operations to Murray Energy of St. Clairsville, Ohio, in a $3.5 billion deal.
The move will enable Consol to concentrate more on its burgeoning Marcellus and Utica shale gas operations. Its remaining mining operations, such as the Bailey Mine in Greene County, the largest such facility in the world, will help provide the cash to bankroll Consol's continuing soldiering into the shale revolution.
It is a business bet foretold by the times. Investors don't see much good ahead for a coal industry beset by the politicization of environmental regulations destined to kill the domestic industry altogether. And the ample availability and promise of shale gas — far cleaner than coal and far richer in byproducts — is a no-brainer for such an energy conglomerate as Consol.
That said, we would be remiss in not noting the passage into history of some of Consol's more legendary connections, such as those to the quite productive Shoemaker and McElroy mines in northern West Virginia and, decades ago in Eastern Ohio, to some of the world's largest strip-mining shovels (The Mountaineer, The Silver Spade and The Gem of Egypt) — mechanical marvels of the day that drove environmentalists nuts.
Indeed, a new era has dawned for Consol. Here's to its winning a commonsense bet.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Thursday wrap
- Calling out Russia: But weakly
- Palmer v. District of Columbia: Upholding the 2nd Amendment
- The China question
- The Western Psych grand jury report: Do the right thing
- The Justice Department’s improper political agenda
- Digitized medical records: They’ve become an unsecured threat
- A Pa. Senate lawsuit?: The claptrap of connivers