Share This Page

Greensburg Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, Oct. 31, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

Lance: To the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County. Facing its biggest challenge in recent memory, the waterworks came up with more excuses than useful service amid filtration problems at a Bell Township treatment plant, which serves more than 120,000 residents. What began with a vague warning to ratepayers evolved into confusion over the areas affected and who should boil water. If anything positive emerges from this experience, it should be better planning and communication by the municipal authority in coping with situations of this scale.

On the “Watch List”: An enviable problem. While many communities struggle to shore up their sagging tax bases, New Stanton officials face a different challenge: planning for new development, both business and residential, that's expected with the completion of an Interstate 70 interchange construction project in 2018. Among considerations, planners say, is that the borough will need to update its land-use policies. The time to start that lengthy process is now.

Laurel: To David McCleary. The Derry Area High School teacher helped start the KIND (Kids In Need In Derry) program, which provides clothing and more to needy families. Today's public school teachers see firsthand the issues that children and young adults cope with. Those who go beyond the job description and reach out to kids in need, by starting similar initiatives or by providing tutoring on their own time, truly earn distinction as teachers.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.