ShareThis Page

Pittsburgh Tuesday takes

| Monday, Nov. 4, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

The Steelers: The 2-6 Pittsburgh Steelers are so bad (“How bad are they?”) that they'll be sending scouts to all those Turkey Bowl games on Thanksgiving Day looking for talent. The Steelers, who gave up the most points in team history at New England last Sunday, are so bad (“How bad are they?”) that, fearing massive no-shows when Buffalo visits this Sunday, they are considering employing that NASCAR gimmick of painting the seats to make it look like there are real people in them. Ahem.

Scofflaw Luke: Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl has decided to be an arrogant lame duck. He's refusing to comply with a state Open Records Office ruling that his daily calendar must be made public. Mr. Ravenstahl says that's something he doesn't “think is necessary.” And City Solicitor Daniel Regan parses the ruling in laughable fashion: Because the city did not defend its decision to not release the calendar, it's the proper thing to do. That's gobbledygook.

It's beginning to look a lot like ... : Pittsburgh's Light Up Night is just more than two weeks away and Thanksgiving is more than three weeks off, as is Hanukkah, but Christmas is in the air more and more each and every day. Amidst all of the early preparations we'll all be making, let's take a moment to remember the less fortunate among us.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.