Share This Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, Nov. 4, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

R.I.P.: JoAnne Boyle. Her name is synonymous with Seton Hill, formerly a small liberal arts women's college that, under her longtime leadership, she transformed into a coed university — and not merely in name but also in mission and function. Mrs. Boyle, 78, of Laughlintown, had retired as Seton Hill president in June. Her record of accomplishments will live on for generations at the Greensburg university on the hill.

Right-to-Know requests: A new wrinkle in local elections this year has been the plethora of public-record requests by both Republicans and Democrats. Evidently both parties are looking more closely at elected officials with an eye toward whether they or their staffs are politicking on the public dime. One Democrat official says it's a practice born out of “desperateness.” Not necessarily. These are public documents. And if officials are minding their Ps and Qs, they have nothing to worry about.

From the blotter: Within the local police blotter are all manner of odd incidents, but this one's a standout. A Derry Township woman told state police that a man robbed her of $90. The alleged robber said this wasn't about cash but about a heroin buy that went bad. Shelby Lynn Irvin, 21, has been charged with making a false report and drug possession. By calling the police, did she expect them to return the $90 in heroin that was allegedly purloined?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.