ObamaCare: The lies grow
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was, appallingly, only half-right when she said of ObamaCare, “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.” Full implementation, one expert now says, will leave 68 percent of Americans unable to keep their private health insurance plans.
“Bottom line: of the 189 million Americans with private health insurance coverage ... at least 129 million will not be able to keep their previous health care plan ... by the end of 2014,” Christopher Conover, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and Duke University's Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, told The Daily Caller.
President Obama insisted nearly 30 times that Americans would be able to keep their insurance plans and doctors. On Monday, he denied ever saying such a thing. Barack Obama is either an ignoramus, a liar or both.
Given how thoroughly presidential statements “are vetted and fact-checked, it is pretty inconceivable that President Obama was not aware that he was engaged in some degree of truth-twisting,” Mr. Conover says.
ObamaCare's mandated “improvements” — including those that force Americans to buy coverage they don't need — raise costs and limit choice. “ObamaCare essentially says ‘Uncle Sam knows best,'” according to Conover.
The more that Americans learn about ObamaCare, the clearer it is that this law is a disaster. And the more Americans it hurts, the more Americans will demand its repeal.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ObamaCare ‘rates’ & reality
- A union’s distress
- The Malaysian jetliner probe: Passport insecurity
- More reefer sanity
- Sunday pops
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- The Thursday wrap
- Another EPA crock: Sulfur silliness
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes