Share This Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, Nov. 11, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Most deadly weapon: State police say Philip Cancilla, 51, shot and killed Christina White, 23, a part-time Westmoreland County corrections officer, and Timothy Reffner, 30, an Army veteran, at the Hempfield Heights apartments before turning the gun on himself. Three people are dead because of a noise dispute among the neighbors, authorities said. In Mr. Cancilla's own words in a handwritten note (as detailed by police): “Can only be provoked for so long before exploding.” Far more deadly than any gun is rage built up and released by an unhinged mind.

Penny-Pinching Season: From Halloween to Christmas, it's Penny-Pinching Season for local borough, township and city leaders as they prepare municipal budgets for 2014. And, indeed, some have become quite adept at stretching already tight budgets. Yet through all the belt-tightening and hand-wringing, rarely do we ever see neighboring jurisdictions get together to share common costs. Change doesn't require any heavy lifting; just pick up the phone.

Digging into trouble: Fortunately there were no injuries when a contractor struck a Peoples Natural Gas line in Murrysville, public safety officials said. But the incident begs some all-too-familiar concerns: Was the gas line properly mapped and/or did the construction company check the site before digging? Natural gas lines shouldn't get “struck,” or worse, if proper attention is paid to mapping and if contractors exercise due diligence before digging.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.