A public outcry has prompted Seattle police to deactivate a “wireless mesh network” designed to give police a private network to share large amounts of data. But another consequence was that it also could be used to collect data of any Internet-ready devices nearby. The police chief says the network will remain deactivated until Seattle City Council approves a draft policy after “vigorous public debate.” Debate is moot. This device is a clear-cut Fourth Amendment violation. ... We keep hearing from “progressives” how those dastardly conservatives are pumping “obscene” amounts of third-party money into elections in a horrible attempt to influence state public policy nationwide. But the Center for Public Integrity says organized labor and other liberal groups outspent conservatives by about $8 million in 2012. Don't count on “progressives” to condemn their “obscenity.” ... Pennsylvania's Republican congressional delegation is rallying around the re-election of Gov. Tom Corbett. PoliticsPa.com reports that the entire 14-member delegation will serve as the “welcoming committee” for a fundraiser Monday in Washington, hosted by former Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour and his BGR Group, a lobbying firm. The cheapest ducat is $1,000. The priciest is $5,000. Perhaps this is an indication that Mr. Corbett is having difficulty raising money in Pennsylvania?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Recasting the EPA: Devolving power to the states
- School funding canard: Money isn’t the answer
- Rick Perry’s indictment: The real abuse
- Another carbon credit scheme
- More foreign aid is no answer to border problem
- Tuesday essay: Sophie
- Public records: Updates needed
- Corbett’s meetings: Get a room
- Rejecting Common Core: Flawed school standards
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Another LCB fumble: The status-quo stupor