Thanksgiving 2013: Some considerations
Often we seem more eager to find fault rather than offer praise when it comes to our culture and government. Thanksgiving calls us to look at life from a different perspective. This year we suggest the following as some reasons you might want to offer a prayer of thanksgiving:
• For the fact that we live along one of the most beautiful stretches of river available in the world. We protect it, but we also need to make better use of its recreational and development opportunities. We applaud the Allegheny River Development Corp. for its organized efforts to restore seasonal hours for boaters hoping to use the locks at the dams in the county. If you're a boater, be sure you are on board.
• For trails along the river and along area valleys. They provide opportunity for healthful recreation and for appreciating the landscape.
• For leaders who have yet to show themselves in our communities. We have faith that there are creative, wise individuals who are willing to step forward into public life and suggest new ways to approach our problems. The public needs to ferret them out.
• For those who, against difficult odds, establish small businesses in our towns. They are motivated by making a living, of course, but also by a belief they can do it where they live. Perhaps they should run for public office.
• For the part-time police who patrol our streets, answer calls and make arrests with dedication to a good job. And they do so without their government employers recognizing that they — like everyone — need full-time work.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Sunday pops
- Expanding Medicaid: Gov.-elect Wolf embraces a false premise
- The Box
- The Kathleen Kane chronicles: New and serious questions are being raised about the Pa. attorney general
- Union ‘fairness’: The dues racket
- The regulatory state: EPA picks a fight
- Obama’s Cuba deal: More appeasement
- Saturday essay: A manger’s light
- Sunday pops
- The Kane chronicles: Meaningless moves
- THE BOX