Share This Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, Nov. 18, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Rough landing: Only the cost-conscious (ahem) Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission would charge a pilot $3,000 for making an emergency landing in August on the Mon-Fayette Expressway, which saved the life of the pilot and his passenger. Brian Nicholson managed to bring the single-engine airplane down safely on the highway, without damaging the road, signs or motorists, when a piece of the plane's propeller broke off. The commission says what's being charged is merely common practice. Obviously consideration of extenuating circumstances is outside the commission's bailiwick.

The right vote: Ligonier's council had good reason to reconsider the Ligonier Valley YMCA's rezoning request, which it approved last week. The alternative would be a court battle it could not win. At issue was inclusion of the “no” vote from former councilwoman Kim Shaffer when the council originally rejected the Y's request. But it was Ms. Shaffer who sold land to the YMCA — land that became the linchpin for Y's expansion plans. That conflict is clear. The initial vote including Shaffer's participation was wrong from the get-go.

Score!: Congratulations to the Greensburg Central Catholic girls soccer team on its second consecutive PIAA Class A championship over Southern Columbia in Hershey. More than a credit to the players' talent, success on this scale takes determination and plenty of hard work.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.