Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Nov. 28, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Laurel: To Pat Petit and the rest of the New Kensington-Arnold School Board. Finally, a school board has publicly recognized the inevitability that in the not-too-distant future school districts will be merging. NK-A plans to contact the Burrell School District to talk merger. Of course, this is already dead. Burrell's board might give NK-A the courtesy of a meeting, but an actual merger? No way.
Lance: To the Allegheny Valley, Leechburg Area, Apollo-Ridge, Riverview and Burrell school boards. With dropping enrollment and rising taxes, it's likely none of these small districts will exist after 2020, but they continue to whistle past the graveyard. It's time all find a merger partner before Harrisburg finds one for them.
On the “Watch List”: The Tarentum Bridge. Twice this season the busiest bridge in the region has had to close due to ice-caused accidents. We would think the bridge — which some halfwit engineer in the '50s decided should go downhill — would be a high priority for PennDOT. Since it's a vital lifeline for 21,000 vehicles per day, perhaps Tarentum, New Kensington and Lower Burrell should take over salting from PennDOT or contract a company to do it.
An observation: Black Friday may have lost some oomph due to all of the pre-Thanksgiving sales and expanded Turkey Day shopping, but that doesn't mean the still-traditional opening of the Christmas shopping season won't be busy. Please be patient out there — and careful too.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Vladimir the corrupt: Up the sanctions against Putin
- The IRS mess: Name a special prosecutor
- The Obama/Biden visit: Oh, the irony
- The problem with BNY Mellon: It wears blinders
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday Takes
- The Nevada standoff