Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Nov. 28, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Lance: To Pennsylvania State Police. It forced a Butler County man, denied his right to purchase a rifle because his background check erroneously flagged him for having an involuntary hospital commitment for mental issues, to file a lawsuit to correct the record. It's the kind of arrogance that continues to give government a bad name.
Lance: To the Baldwin-Whitehall School Board. It's pretty much clammed up over its legally dubious hiring of a school director who resigned his seat to take a cushy $120,000-a-year job created just for him. The state Department of Education says the hiring was illegal. But don't expect this board to do the right thing. It looks like this matter will have to be settled in court.
Lance: To Allegheny County's proposed capital budget. It contains a $500,000 line item to help bail out the insolvent August Wilson black cultural center. But as County Councilman Michael Finnerty, D-Scott, astutely notes, that's not a capital budget function. Here's hoping its inclusion was a mistake and not an attempt at sneaking and snookering.
An observation: Whether Black Friday has the oomph it once had remains to be seen, what with all the pre-Thanksgiving sales and expanded Thanksgiving Day shopping. But that doesn't mean the still-traditional opening of the Christmas shopping season won't be busy. So, buy some patience with all those presents today. And be careful out there.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.