The Daily Caller reports that Miley Cyrus did something “shocking” last weekend: “She actually wore clothes” during one of those Hollywood awards shows. Well, it is the season of miracles ... Over at PJ Media, David Steinberg reports that the Obama administration has forced all 50 state Medicaid agencies to “create a new standalone database” for the express purpose of making them available to Democrat activists. The same crew that rails against “dark money” in politics apparently has no qualms about “dark ops” in politics. ... As the Trib's Deb Erdley reports, Pennsylvania does not require Pitt, Penn State or Temple to report travel and hospitality to an individual unless gifts exceed $650 in a year. Gee, and here we thought taxpayers had a right to know who the bribers and bribees are. ... CNN kept reporting how bad travel conditions were in Pittsburgh last week while showing clear highways. Even after the predicted storm fizzled, it kept touting how the city was expecting a foot of snow. Hey, why let the facts on the ground — or not on the ground, in this case — get in the way of a preconceived story line? ... The nation's banks are threatening to charge customers for making deposits if the Federal Reserve cuts the interest rate it pays on bank reserves. Dear Santa: Please bring everyone empty coffee cans and sturdy shovels so they can start making backyard deposits again.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.